Alison Van Uytvanck vs Monica Niculescu Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W L L W L L W L
Form
L W W W L W W L W WHead To Head: Uytvanck 2 - 2 Niculescu
They have played 7 sets in total, with Uytvanck winning 5 and Niculescu winning 2. The last match between Uytvanck and Niculescu was at the BGL Luxembourg Open - Luxembourg, 15-10-2019, First, I.hard with Monica Niculescu getting the victory 2-4 ret..
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Alison Van Uytvanck | 2 |
| Monica Niculescu | 2 |
BGL Luxembourg Open - Luxembourg(15-10-2019)
| Uytvanck | Stats | Niculescu |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 2 |
| 229 | Ranking | 687 |
| 37 | Highest Rank | 28 |
| 31 | Age | 37 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 24 | Titles | 16 |
| 60% (405-271) | Career Total W/L | 57% (475-354) |
| $2,105,038 | Career Prize Money | $2,875,657 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 1 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 1 |
| 1 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Andreeva VS Bouzkova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Noskova VS Carle PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-4 ret. |
Stats 
Monica Niculescu
Player
Alison Van Uytvanck
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve %
81%
(
21 of
26)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
47%
(
9 of
19)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
33%
(
1 of
3)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
55%
(
12 of
22)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
21
Total Points Won
27
|
||||
| 6-2 6-1 |
Stats
Alison Van Uytvanck
Player
Monica Niculescu
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve %
85%
(
40 of
47)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
58%
(
19 of
33)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
74%
(
17 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
||||
| 6-3 6-2 |
Stats
Monica Niculescu
Player
Alison Van Uytvanck
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
50%
(
30 of
60)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
22 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
69
Total Points Won
45
|
||||
| 7-5 6-3 |
Stats
Alison Van Uytvanck
Player
Monica Niculescu
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve %
72%
(
41 of
57)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
26 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
68
Total Points Won
58
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 5 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 34 | Games Won | 25 |
| 7 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 6 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 1:16:9 | Average Match Time | 1:16:9 |
| 62% (131/211) | 1st Serve % | 75% (135/180) |
| 58% (76/131) | 1st Serve Win % | 54% (73/135) |
| 51% (41/80) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (22/45) |
| 50% (14/28) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 31% (11/35) |
| 47% (85/182) | Return Points Win % | 44% (94/213) |
| 67% (2/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (3/3) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (3/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (3/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Alison Van Uytvanck Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Julia Middendorf
Player
Alison Van Uytvanck
56%
(
33 of
59)
1st Serve %
55%
(
28 of
51)
4
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alison Van Uytvanck
Player
Julia Avdeeva
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
50%
(
23 of
46)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
8
56%
(
18 of
32)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
74%
(
17 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jana Fett
Player
Alison Van Uytvanck
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve %
52%
(
25 of
48)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
53%
(
23 of
43)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
46%
(
30 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Louisa Chirico
Player
Alison Van Uytvanck
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
69)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
35%
(
7 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
8 of
32)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
44%
(
28 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
37 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alison Van Uytvanck
Player
Ipek Oz
54%
(
26 of
48)
1st Serve %
63%
(
37 of
59)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
62
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yuliia Starodubtseva
Player
Alison Van Uytvanck
81%
(
43 of
53)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
40%
(
4 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kamilla Rakhimova
Player
Alison Van Uytvanck
45%
(
25 of
55)
1st Serve %
38%
(
20 of
53)
0
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
60%
(
15 of
25)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
14 of
20)
40%
(
12 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
9 of
33)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
51%
(
28 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
57
Total Points Won
51
|
7-6(1) 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alison Van Uytvanck
Player
Celine Naef
66%
(
45 of
68)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
70)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
8 of
29)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
70)
79
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Liudmila Samsonova
Player
Alison Van Uytvanck
47%
(
32 of
68)
1st Serve %
67%
(
29 of
43)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
40%
(
27 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Alison Van Uytvanck
Player
Tatjana Maria
66%
(
57 of
86)
1st Serve %
56%
(
46 of
82)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
27 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
82)
93
Total Points Won
75
|
6-7(5) 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Monica Niculescu Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF | w/o | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Monica Niculescu
Player
Katrina Scott
66%
(
47 of
71)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
1
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(6) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF | w/o | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Monica Niculescu
Player
Emily Webley-Smith
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve %
40%
(
14 of
35)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
11 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
50
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dalma Galfi
Player
Monica Niculescu
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
12
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
65
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Monica Niculescu
Player
Samantha Murray
77%
(
77 of
100)
1st Serve %
63%
(
56 of
89)
3
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
6
60%
(
46 of
77)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
36 of
56)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
44%
(
44 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
89)
94
Total Points Won
95
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Monica Niculescu
Player
Maddison Inglis
74%
(
76 of
103)
1st Serve %
67%
(
72 of
107)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
72%
(
55 of
76)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
47 of
72)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
34%
(
35 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
41 of
107)
109
Total Points Won
101
|
6-4 6-7(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aryna Sabalenka
Player
Monica Niculescu
55%
(
31 of
56)
1st Serve %
86%
(
51 of
59)
6
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
20 of
51)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
70
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Monica Niculescu
Player
Kristie Ahn
82%
(
49 of
60)
1st Serve %
74%
(
57 of
77)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
41 of
77)
79
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Monica Niculescu
Player
Asia Muhammad
82%
(
46 of
56)
1st Serve %
55%
(
34 of
62)
0
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
40%
(
4 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
41%
(
23 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60% (405/271) | Win/Loss | 57% (475/354) |
| 59% (906/640) | Sets Win/Loss | 57% (1091/830) |
| 54% (7691/6575) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (9260/8066) |
| 51% (103/98) | Hard Win/Loss | 57% (223/167) |
| 56% (94/73) | Clay Win/Loss | 56% (123/95) |
| 70% (154/66) | Indoor Hard W/L | 61% (96/62) |
| 61% (54/34) | Grass Win/Loss | 52% (33/30) |
| 0.28 | Aces Per Game | 0.06 |
| 1937 | Aces Total | 541 |
| 0.18 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.13 |
| 1271 | Total Double Faults | 1068 |
| 1:10:23 | Average Match Time | 1:2:2 |
| 468.18 | Average Opponent Rank | 478.84 |
| 60% (21180/35426) | 1st Serve % | 73% (29793/40616) |
| 67% (14202/21180) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (17068/29793) |
| 48% (6850/14241) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (4870/10822) |
| 44% (1834/4130) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (2816/5656) |
| 43% (15559/36045) | Return Points Win % | 48% (19729/41227) |
| 42% (28/39) | Slam W/L | 49% (55/57) |
| 42% (24/33) | Masters W/L | 51% (85/81) |
| 60% (12/8) | Cups W/L | 60% (9/6) |
| 54% (131/110) | Main Tour W/L | 54% (158/135) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 69% (145/65) | Challenger W/L | 68% (154/71) |
| 80% (65/16) | Futures W/L | 78% (14/4) |
| 61% (398/655) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (468/812) |
| 80% (4/5) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 20% (1/5) |
| 43% (70/161) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (75/148) |
| 52% (107/204) | Deciding Set Win % | 47% (127/271) |
| 86% (411/352) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 81% (497/404) |
| 14% (411/57) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 18% (497/90) |
| 20% (265/54) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (331/68) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
